Isabella Shinikova vs Angelique Van Der Meet Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W L L
Form
L W W W L W L W W WH2H: Shinikova 1 - 0 Meet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shinikova winning 2 and Meet winning 0. The last match between Shinikova and Meet was at the Wiesbaden, 28-04-2014, Q3, Clay with Isabella Shinikova getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-6(7).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Isabella Shinikova | 1 |
| Angelique Van Der Meet | 0 |
Wiesbaden(28-04-2014)
| Shinikova | Stats | Meet |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (26-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 345 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 228 |
| 33 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 27 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (617-411) | Career Total W/L | 67% (148-72) |
| $232,173 | Career Prize Money | $12,028 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Machac PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Isabella Shinikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Carlotta Moccia
Player
Isabella Shinikova
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Isabella Shinikova
76%
(
74 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Victoria Allen
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daria Zelinskaya
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sofia Shapatava
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Zuzanna Pawlikowska
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Maria Kalyakina
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Julita Saner
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
78%
(
77 of
99)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Danielle Daley
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Angelique Van Der Meet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| F | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (617/411) | Win/Loss | 67% (148/72) |
| 58% (1362/1004) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (314/175) |
| 53% (11481/10210) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2488/1941) |
| 66% (188/95) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) |
| 60% (323/216) | Clay Win/Loss | 71% (123/50) |
| 54% (102/88) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (22/17) |
| 25% (4/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1555 | Aces Total | 36 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 2669 | Total Double Faults | 50 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 557.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 624.7 |
| 60% (26218/43714) | 1st Serve % | 51% (241/471) |
| 63% (16522/26218) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (174/241) |
| 45% (7876/17497) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (104/230) |
| 49% (2803/5669) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (30/58) |
| 47% (20467/43924) | Return Points Win % | 46% (212/458) |
| 36% (9/16) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (10/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (29/41) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (289/224) | Challenger W/L | 65% (102/56) |
| 71% (280/115) | Futures W/L | 75% (45/15) |
| 60% (611/1021) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (144/214) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (110/209) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (16/42) |
| 58% (181/314) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (31/53) |
| 88% (587/519) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (142/129) |
| 12% (587/68) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (142/13) |
| 22% (440/97) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (78/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
